Skip to content

W3 R95 and R95-A — original/independent exact observed-law ledger

For a plain-language account of R95 missing gaze and selective audit return, start with the R95 conditional identification article or the assumption-dependent missing-gaze bounds comparison. This ledger documents independent algebra and replay evidence; neither a returned-record audit nor this software identifies unreturned outcomes without external assumptions.

Scope: exact rational binary originally missing outcome identification, conditional on hypothetically externally known monotone direction/ratio of actual audit completion. There are no Monte Carlo replicates, participant observations, empirical validation, confidence intervals, or calibrated W3 simultaneous bands.

Original frozen exact design

Evidence component Immutable record
Original draft scientific source PR #462
Original head SHA 1223015d70cb74c31e8f8cdeb0d088ccf0855b25
Original scientific workflow #39872191344, 4/4 PASS
Original immutable evidence Artifact #12466408311, w3-r95-immutable-original-54-exact-directions
Original archived members r95_exact_source.json, SHA256SUMS
Frozen design denominator 3 invited nonreturn fractions × 3 known invitation rates × 6 directional/equality/ratio regimes = 54 deterministic exact rational cases
Public implementation/API status Research-only, draft/unmerged, no changes

Each original row has all four observed event probabilities, the exact sharp interval, its width, two attainable latent completion-law endpoints, an explicit external-assumption label, and no-release/no-coverage flags. The same observed law must hold for every hypothetical return direction.

Independent derivation and mandatory original archive replay

Evidence component Immutable record
Separate R95-A audit draft PR #463, stacked on original #462
Independent head SHA edbe14c4a1003cc014325fd36124ada08b8c2184
Independent workflow #39872459692, 4/4 PASS
Independent evidence Artifact #12467176301, w3-r95-A-independent-actual-original-54-case-replay
Mandatory condition Download actual original workflow #39872191344 SHA256 archive; reject incomplete/tampered members; independently recalculate and match all 54 source records
Independent method Allocate unknown unreturned \(Z=1\) mass \(t\), enforce response direction or positive ratio cap, verify both endpoint response witnesses and four-category observed event mass
Replay result All 54/54 frozen source records reconstructed exactly from independent mathematical factorization
Claimed validation Reproducibility of a narrow exact mathematical identification theorem, not real-world gaze sensitivity/coverage

Analytical figure lineage

Figure Mathematical original Displayed interpretation
R95 direction-conditioned sharp set δ=1/100, \(q_0=q_1=(1-\delta)/2\), six frozen shape regimes Sharp population mean endpoints (rounded), not confidence intervals
R95 width across return rates δ=1/1000,1/100,1/20; widths \(\delta\), \(\delta/2\), \(\delta/[2(2+\delta)]\), \(0\) Algebraic source widths; no confidence or Monte Carlo uncertainty

Critical scientific restrictions

The latent response direction is not identified by the known randomized invitation probability or observed returned outcomes. A point-identified parameter under assumed \(c_1=c_0\) is not evidence that equality holds in nature. Equal observational likelihood across distinct latent laws is verified, so no method based solely on this observable event distribution can consistently distinguish those latent laws in general.

All original/audit research source remains draft/unmerged, the public package/API and stable 1.1.0 are untouched, and v1.2/GitHub/PyPI release is on hold. Scientific blocker #289 (simultaneous bands) and #296 (observation-dependent missing gaze) remain open. This article/figure package may merge documentation only, after 25/25 exact-head CI PASS and separate protected-main Pages docs-build/deployment PASS.