Skip to content

F1 higher-precision native sparse-PACE null and power study (research only)

The previously retained full-fitted F1 study had 300 null datasets per scenario and 199 permutations per fit. In the balanced independent equal-covariance null, 23/300 (7.67%) simulations rejected at nominal 5%. This interval was too wide to certify a statistically calibrated procedure. Source original waveform study #37965949039; checksum-recovered source study #37969068128. No production inferential qualification follows.

A new independent 6,000-attempt study

The research-f1-independent-null-and-moderate-power.yml workflow is limited to one pull request opened event or explicit manual dispatch, avoiding expensive resimulation on documentation edits. The original scientific evidence is not reused as independent data.

Four predeclared settings, each 1,000 independent true-null fits and 500 moderate alternatives (6,000 total), all invoking the real test_sparse_functional_groups full sparse-PACE fit, with 199 participant-unit permutations per attempt and new deterministic independently keyed master seed 20261125:

Design Group units Observations/curve Trial structure Label-exchangeability
Balanced equal covariance 8 + 8 17 1 trial/unit Nominal null assumption
Two trials per participant 8 + 8 17 2 repeated participant trials Permute participant labels as clusters
Unequal and heteroscedastic 8 + 16 17 1 trial/unit Violated; stress only
Very sparse independent 8 + 8 9 1 trial/unit Nominal null assumption if conditions met

True null effect is exactly 0 and alternative sinusoidal shift amplitude 0.04. This is a new, less extreme alternative than the earlier 0.11 model; power at this one effect size cannot establish a general power curve or optimal sample-size recommendation. Noise SD is 0.015, and the native PACE test's measurement-error and bandwidth contracts stay unchanged to ensure genuine replication of the original procedure.

Each fit retains its exact seed, design, participant-level condition, p-value or error, and status. Reports show unconditional attempted denominators, counts of failures and conditional-on-fit rejection at alpha .01/.05/.10 with exact Monte Carlo intervals. Failed fits are never silently discarded or reclassified as calibrated nonrejections. A failure-free run is not a statistical qualification by itself.

The aggregator checks original SHA256 files, 6,000 distinct simulation seed streams, exactly 1,000 null and 500 alternative cases per design, case-level status and agreement of empirical rejection counts to per-shard source evidence. No automatic scientific/promotional flag is set upon a green workflow.

Qualification boundary

Balanced and sparsely sampled independent group conditions should be judged separately from participant-clustered and deliberately nonexchangeable heteroscedastic conditions. Even 1,000 nulls give finite Monte Carlo uncertainty; exact binomial intervals and the 199-permutation discrete p-value grid must be reported. The clustered-trial implementation requires its own independent review that participant IDs, not trials, define the permutations.

The broader F1 inferential programme still requires alternative effect sizes, sample-size and missingness studies and independent comparison with a second test. Until then statistical_null_size_qualified=false, statistical_power_qualified=false, and release_authorized=false.

No change to protected main or stable 1.1.0 is part of this experiment.

Completed independent 6,000-fit F1 study (source-verified)

Actual 6,000-F1-fit empirical null-size and moderate-power comparison

Original exact-source workflow #37977625803 completed 5/5 study jobs, including 4,000 independent native sparse-PACE true-null fits and 2,000 moderate-effect alternatives with zero exceptions. The original immutable combined archive artifact is 11640464273; four separately SHA256-audited design artifacts were retained.

Predeclared design α=.05 true-null rejects/1,000 Exact 95% MC interval α=.05 moderate alternative rejects/500 Exact 95% MC interval
Balanced equal covariance 49/1000 = 4.9% 3.65–6.43% 79/500 = 15.8% 12.71–19.30%
Repeated two trials/participant 51/1000 = 5.1% 3.82–6.65% 91/500 = 18.2% 14.91–21.87%
Unequal heterogeneous noise 52/1000 = 5.2% 3.91–6.76% 96/500 = 19.2% 15.84–22.93%
Very sparse 44/1000 = 4.4% 3.21–5.86% 71/500 = 14.2% 11.26–17.57%

Interpretation: the new independent null sizes are all statistically consistent with nominal 5% at this single sample-size/parameter setting. The previous balanced 23/300=7.67% null rate is less precise and does not establish a stable anti-conservative pattern. Neither apparent null alignment nor zero fit failures guarantees universal valid inference. The unequal heteroscedastic condition intentionally breaks pooled permutation exchangeability, so its approximately nominal observed size is an empirical outcome, not a mathematical validity proof.

Moderate effect 0.04 detection was only 14.2–19.2% at α=.05. The previous 0.11-effect pilot's ~98–99% rejection is not general power. The native sparse-PACE method's inferential use now needs a power/size curve across realistic amplitude, independent participant sample size, and missingness, plus separate cluster and heteroscedasticity validity review. No scientific or release gate is automatically promoted. All original cases and scientific exceptions remain retained for independent review.