
Define an empirical process-validation design
Source:R/069-validation-program-0-9.R
process_validation_design.RdThe design is intentionally explicit. It records measurement conditions under which recovery, uncertainty, convergence, and failure behavior will be evaluated. It does not imply that every combination is appropriate for every estimator.
Usage
process_validation_design(
n_persons = c(50L, 150L, 500L),
n_trials = c(10L, 30L, 80L),
missingness = c(0, 0.05, 0.15, 0.3),
sampling_rate_hz = c(60, 120, 300, 1000),
aoi_error = c("low", "moderate", "severe"),
calibration_error = c(0, 0.5, 1),
pupil_dropout = c(0, 0.1, 0.3),
heterogeneity = c("low", "moderate"),
model_misspecification = c(FALSE, TRUE),
replications = 100L,
seed = 1L,
label = "process_validation"
)Arguments
- n_persons
Participant counts.
- n_trials
Trial/item counts per participant.
- missingness
Proportion of generic process observations made missing.
- sampling_rate_hz
Nominal sampling rates.
- aoi_error
AOI uncertainty regimes.
- calibration_error
Calibration-error regimes in user-defined units.
- pupil_dropout
Pupil-specific dropout proportions.
- heterogeneity
Participant-heterogeneity regimes.
- model_misspecification
Logical regimes indicating deliberate mismatch.
- replications
Monte Carlo replications per condition.
- seed
Master simulation seed.
- label
Optional design label.